Kwan Woo Kim

Immigration Attitudes & Political Economy

The rise of populist radical-right parties across Europe has been fueled by voters who want both generous and exclusive welfare provision alongside closed borders — a combination that cuts across the conventional left-right divide in mainstream politics. Motivated by this puzzle, I examine how the occupational presence of immigrants shapes native-born workers’ attitudes toward welfare and immigration.

Occupational Composition & Welfare Attitudes

Difference in probability of adherence to each welfare-immigration schema, by whether immigrants in the respondent's occupation hold a college degree

Kim, Kwan Woo. “Competition or Credentialism? The Occupational Presence of Immigrants and European Attitudes Toward Welfare and Immigration.” Revise and Resubmit, Socio-Economic Review.

Using the European Social Survey and latent class analysis, I identify four attitudinal clusters to which European workers adhere, and correlate each worker’s welfare-immigration attitudes with the share of immigrants in their occupation. Across education levels, workers lean inclusive (pro-welfare, pro-immigration) in occupations where college-educated immigrants make up a larger share, and chauvinist (pro-welfare, anti-immigration) where less-educated immigrants make up a larger share. This finding largely supports the credentialism hypothesis: native-born workers’ exclusionary attitudes on welfare and immigration track immigrants’ perceived lack of credentials more than any perceived occupational threat posed by their presence.